IJE Software logoIJEsoft
ServicesPortfolioPricingAboutCase StudyStackNewsBlogPartnerPH NewsMarketsContactGet in touch
← Back to Philippines Business News
Rappler Business

‘Floating’ money: Did the Dutertes use manager’s checks to hide wealth off bank balances?

'Repeatedly issuing and cancelling manager’s checks around year-end could therefore raise red flags of reverse window dressing, making bank balances appear smaller without actually reducing wealth,' says global tax policy expert Mon Abrea

Context & Analysis

Manager’s checks remain one of the more distinctive features of Philippine banking practice. They allow a payer to issue an instrument with a future date, which can be useful for payroll, supplier settlements, or managing seasonal cash flow. At the same time, they occupy an awkward middle ground in financial reporting: funds may be committed, but settlement timing can differ from ordinary deposit movements. That makes them a common area of scrutiny when statements are prepared for lenders, tax filings, bank audits, or public asset disclosures.

For businesses, the practical issue is control. A company that uses postdated checks heavily needs a clear register showing who received each instrument, what it was for, when it was drawn, and whether it was later voided or paid. Weak record-keeping can turn routine operations into an audit problem, especially when balances move sharply near reporting dates. It can also affect how banks view credit risk, because deposits are not just a line item; they signal liquidity, payment behavior, and the reliability of the account holder’s cash management.

The political dimension sharpens the stakes. Public officials and candidates in the Philippines are expected to file asset disclosures that help voters, anti-corruption bodies, and electoral authorities assess whether reported income is consistent with accumulated wealth. Institutionally, the issue touches more than one regulator: banks are supervised by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, tax filings are examined by the Bureau of Internal Revenue, and public disclosures may be reviewed by the Ombudsman or Commission on Elections. When bank records show unusual check patterns, the question becomes less about one transaction and more about account governance, authorization, related-party involvement, and whether internal controls caught anything abnormal.

What to watch next is whether the matter stays in public debate or moves into formal review by tax, banking, or disclosure authorities. For readers outside politics, the lesson is familiar: transparency depends on records, reconciliation, and a paper trail that can withstand questions.

Analysis by IJE Software — original commentary on the story above.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article at the original source:

Source: rappler.com

More from Rappler Business

[Good Business] The AI nutrition label: Why we need to know what’s inside before we trust it

11h ago

CrowdStrike says China-based suspect used AI tools in South Korean bank hacks

12h ago

Anyare? Villars’ AllHome, AllDay confirm store closures

1d ago

[In This Economy] Cesar Virata, technocrat who helped finance a dictatorship

1d ago

Your Daily Briefing

AI business companion — delivered every morning

Markets, PH news, financial insights, and devotionals — curated by AI and sent at 7 AM PHT. Pick your topics below.

Devotionals
Blog Topics
HR & Workforce
Real Estate & Property
News & Markets

1 topic selected